|
CTRL-D to Bookmark
Home Page
Hope for the Future
EPA.gov/climatechange
ScienceDaily.com
National Geographic
Treehugger.com
WeCanSolveIt.org
World Wildlife
Fund
Fight Global
Warming.org
StopGlobal
Warming.org
GlobalWarming.org
Earth 4 Energy - Renewable Energy Solutions - Wind And Solar Power!
<<<<<>>>>>
Check out:
AngelArt1
AnEmailFrom
theAngels.com
<<<<<>>>>>
Maverick Money Makers
Get Paid for Life
Forget Learning Just Copy my Campaigns
<<<<<>>>>>



















| |
Global
Starvation Ignored by American Policy Elites
By Peter Phillips
12/09/08 "ICH"
-- - -A new report (9/2/08) from The World Bank admits that in 2005 three
billion one hundred and forty million people live on less that $2.50 a day and
about 44% of these people survive on less than $1.25. Complete and total
wretchedness can be the only description for the circumstances faced by so many,
especially those in urban areas. Simple items like phone calls, nutritious food,
vacations, television, dental care, and inoculations are beyond the possible for
billions of people.
Starvation.net logs the increasing impacts of world hunger and starvation. Over
30,000 people a day (85% children under 5) die of malnutrition, curable
diseases, and starvation. The numbers of unnecessary deaths has exceeded three
hundred million people over the past forty years.
These are the people who David Rothkopf in his book Superclass calls the
unlucky. “If you happen to be born in the wrong place, like sub-Saharan Africa,
…that is bad luck,” Rothkopf writes. Rothkopf goes on to describe how the top
10% of the adults worldwide own 84% of the wealth and the bottom half owns
barely 1%. Included in the top 10% of wealth holders are the one thousand global
billionaires. But is such a contrast of wealth inequality really the result of
luck, or are there policies, supported by political elites, that protect the few
at the expense of the many?
Farmers around the world grow more than enough food to feed the entire world
adequately. Global grain production yielded a record 2.3 billion tons in 2007,
up 4% from the year before, yet, billions of people go hungry every day.
Grain.org describes the core reasons for continuing hunger in a recent article
“Making a Killing from Hunger.” It turns out that while farmers grow enough food
to feed the world, commodity speculators and huge grain traders like Cargill
control the global food prices and distribution. Starvation is profitable for
corporations when demands for food push the prices up. Cargill announced that
profits for commodity trading for the first quarter of 2008 were 86% above 2007.
World food prices grew 22% from June 2007 to June 2008 and a significant portion
of the increase was propelled by the $175 billion invested in commodity futures
that speculate on price instead of seeking to feed the hungry. The result is
wild food price spirals, both up and down, with food insecurity remaining
widespread.
For a family on the bottom rung of poverty a small price increase is the
difference between life and death, yet neither US presidential candidate has
declared a war on starvation. Instead both candidates talk about national
security and the continuation of the war on terror as if this were the primary
election issue. Where is the Manhattan project for global hunger? Where is the
commitment to national security though unilateral starvation relief? Where is
the outrage in the corporate media with pictures of dying children and an
analysis of who benefits from hunger?
American people cringe at the though of starving children, often thinking that
there is little they can do about it, save sending in a donation to their
favorite charity for a little guilt relief. Yet giving is not enough, we must
demand hunger relief as a national policy inside the next presidency. It is a
moral imperative for us as the richest nation in the world nation to prioritize
a political movement of human betterment and starvation relief for the billions
in need. Global hunger and massive wealth inequality is based on political
policies that can be changed. There will be no national security in the US
without the basic food needs of the world being realized.
Peter Phillips is a professor of sociology at Sonoma State University and
director of Project Censored a media research group. His new book Censored 2009
is now available from by Seven Stories Press.
From:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20748.htm
|